Abstract
As migration scholars we have a common desire to better understand the drivers, processes and consequences of people relocating and settling in new environments (Scholten, Pisarevskaya & Levy, 2022). However, dominant research practices often result in research ‘on’ rather than ‘with’ migrants (Fiorito, 2024; Rydzik, Pritchard, Morgan & Sedgley, 2013). Such research can contribute to the reproduction and exacerbation of the marginalisation and inequalities migration research often aims to address (Fiorito, 2024). Participatory research methods that prioritise co-creation can minimise the reproduction of stereotypes, misrepresentation and marginalisation of migrants (Fiorito, 2024). Co-creation involves various stakeholders bringing their different experiences, perspectives and understandings together to generate new knowledge and solutions (Larruina & Ghorashi, 2020). A core component of co-creation is the involvement of the client or end-user of the policies (Larruina & Ghorashi, 2020) products or services. In the case of co-creation in migration research, the involvement of the migrants whose experiences are at the centre of the enquiry is critical (Fiorito, 2024). Therefore, co-creation is a form of participation that minimises power imbalances and the preferencing of particular forms of knowledge (Larruina & Ghorashi, 2020). Despite recognition of the benefits of participatory research and increasing interest in such approaches, research prioritising co-creation is not yet common practice. Through this panel discussion, we aim to discuss and demonstrate the value and viability of co-creation as a core principle of ethical, participant centred research. We hope the panel will bring together researchers, civil society practitioners and research participants to discuss their experiences of working collaboratively in the co-creation of research material and the generation of knowledge. We envisage considering questions such as: What is the difference between co-creational and participatory research approaches? How can co-creation improve research outcomes and impact. What are direct and indirect benefits of co-creation for migrant participants and communities? How can co-creational research contribute to improving policymaking? What are some of the challenges with co-creation in research and how can these be overcome? This panel explicitly connects with the core theme of the conference by encouraging researchers to engage and collaborate with migrant communities in the co-creation of research material and knowledge. By presenting examples of research involving co-creation and addressing common challenges such as time constraints, differing priorities, and institutional expectations, we hope participants will leave with practical tips and ideally inspiration for engaging with this research method. The anticipated involvement of researchers, practitioners, and research participants in the panel will directly demonstrate the benefits of collaboration, co-creation and the value of different forms of knowledge.