Abstract
This thesis deals with accounting-based equity valuation models. The first study contrasts the performance of three commonly used valuation models, using a large sample of analysts’ forecasts of the elements valued by these models (free cash flow, dividends and abnormal earnings/residual income). The second study investigates empirically whether discount rate estimation is a first-order effect in equity valuation. The third and fourth studies focus on developing routines for implementation of multi-period valuation models, including the critical issue of terminal value estimation. The thesis shows how model choice is a critical issue, given standard implementation of the valuation models (Study 1); how standard models for discount rate estimation are of little or no use practically (Study 2); how one can implement a multi-period valuation framework such that everything is internally consistent, and how this leads to several desirable features, such as model equivalency (Studies 3 and 4). The thesis is valuable to readers interested in accounting-based equity valuation who wish to understand, to distinguish among, and to appropriately implement valuation techniques.