Abstract
It is common in cost-effectiveness analyses of health care to only include health care costs, with the argument that some fictive ‘health care budget’ should be used to maximize the health effects. This paper provides a criticism of the ‘health care budget’ approach to cost-effectiveness analysis of health care. It is argued that the approach is ad hoc and lacks theoretical foundation. The approach is also inconsistent with using a fixed budget as the decision rule for cost-effectiveness analysis. That is the case unless only costs that fall into a single annual actual budget are included in the analysis, which would mean that any costs paid by the patients should be excluded as well as any future cost changes and all costs that fall on other budgets. Furthermore the prices facing the budget holder should be used, rather than opportunity costs. It is concluded that the ‘health care budget’ perspective should be abandoned and the societal perspective reinstated in economic evaluation of health care.