Abstract
How do changes in a rating agency's reputation affect the ratings market? We study the dynamics of credit ratings after StandardXX1Poor's (S&P) was shut out of a large segment of the commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) ratings market following a procedural mistake. Exploiting the fact that most CMBS have ratings from multiple agencies, we show that S&P subsequently eased its standards compared to other raters. This coincided with a partial recovery in the number of deals S&P was hired to rate. Our findings suggest that an agency can regain market share after suffering reputational damage by issuing optimistic ratings. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.